Outside-IN

Outside-INblog

Outside voices and views for advisers

The top 5 mistakes made by 401(k) plan sponsors

Helping retirement-plan clients avoid common administrative pitfalls can save them time and money

Jul 5, 2017 @ 3:39 pm

By Aaron Pottichen

As a retirement plan consultant, I have come across many plan sponsors that have inadvertently made mistakes in their 401(k) plans. Most have just never had anyone show them how to correctly administer a 401(k), or they have so much on their plate that something inevitably falls through the cracks.

Penalties for administrative blunders can be costly, through fines or, at the severe end of the spectrum, plan disqualification, creating a taxable event for all participants.

Below, I've outlined the most common mistakes I've seen plan sponsors make, as well as ways for plan advisers to guide their clients away from those mistakes.

• Not remitting payroll in a timely manner

Of all the problems I'll discuss, none is more obvious to plan participants than not remitting payroll to the record keeper in a timely manner. This can become an internal public relations disaster for a company. A plan sponsor might also have to go through a voluntary correction program, and potentially owe fines depending on the severity of the mistake.

We recommend clients set up a 360 integration with their payroll vendor and record keeper, which entails setting up automatic feeds between the service providers. While this isn't available in every payroll and record-keeper situation, it is becoming more prevalent.

If plan administrators are uncertain about following through on remitting timely payroll, we recommend they consider hiring a 3(16) fiduciary, which assumes fiduciary responsibility for plan administration, to take over that responsibility.

• Not following the plan document correctly

While record-keeping systems are set up to halt non-compliant procedures, they don't catch everything.

Case in point: Our firm once came across a plan that had not automatically enrolled employees, even though its plan document stated employees should be automatically enrolled unless they had declined enrollment. This oversight by the employer ended up costing hours of work for the company and a few thousand dollars in penalties.

To avoid plan-document-related mistakes, we tend to advise clients not to overly complicate plan design. While some circumstances may favor a more complex design, simpler is, more often than not, a good way to go.

• Not benchmarking plan fees

The recent spate of lawsuits in 401(k) land is an easy way to show plan sponsors why they should be benchmarking their retirement plan fees.

A few years ago, our firm came across a plan that was in the hundred-million-dollar range, and no one that administered the plan could remember having reviewed the fees. After dissecting the fees, we discovered the plan was paying double the benchmark average for a similar-sized plan.

The best solution here is for advisers to take the reins and run a benchmark report on a frequency of no less than every three years. If the plan is growing quickly in participant headcount and assets, it may be worthwhile to do this annually.

• Not selecting a quality auditor

I cannot stress enough the importance a good auditor provides in making sure a company is doing the right things at the right time.

A client of ours was notified by its auditor of incorrect deferral amounts that had been remitted on behalf of participants throughout the year. This oversight might not have been discovered without a notification from the auditor. Because it was, participants had more money deferred into their 401(k) and had more employer match contributed on their behalf.

When recommending an auditor, it's best to go with one that performs a lot of qualified plan audits, as the Internal Revenue Service has concluded their reports contain fewer errors.

• Not documenting the reason for changes

When it comes to the retirement plan, a plan sponsor's institutional knowledge is great. But documentation is everything.

Our firm has commonly encountered plan administrators new in their role who have no idea as to why certain plan features, investments or vendors were selected. Part of the reason for this is because the decisions that lead to those features and vendors are not documented anywhere.

For example, a plan sponsor we worked with was using a vendor deficient in areas in which the sponsor clearly needed help. As it turns out, the company had allowed a small group of employees to perform the vendor search and selection. This ended up being a positive story, because the employees had a strong connection to the vendor they selected.

But the takeaway here is that documentation of decisions today helps guide tomorrow's decisions. This is why plan advisers should take diligent notes of meetings; it's also a way to add instant value to a new plan administrator.

Humans are fallible and mistakes will happen, but the solutions listed above can help clients avoid them. Part of the value retirement plan advisers provide is in guiding clients away from land mines.

Aaron Pottichen is the retirement services president at CLS Partners, an Austin, Texas-based financial advisory firm.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Use Mopedia' to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Apr 30

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join Mopedia at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Guidestone's David Spika says great data is critical for great socially responsible investing. Why and how can it work in your client's portfolio?

Video Spotlight

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Channels

Latest news & opinion

Tax reform: What advisers need to know about the Senate bill

Some key differences from House bill include how mortgage deduction and estate taxes are treated.

Tax reform: House bill revisions include lower pass-through rate for small businesses

Last-minute changes also include restoration of adoption credit and elimination of limits on interest deductions for car dealers.

Merrill Lynch releases new compensation plan

Advisers bringing in enough accounts will be rewarded, those falling short will see compensation cut.

Brian Block sentenced to 18 months in prison

The government had sought a sentence of at least seven years against the former Nick Schorsch colleague.

Clayton: SEC targets 'complex, hidden fees'

Putting clients in expensive share classes instead of lower-cost ones hurts investors, chairman says.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Last News

80s supercars mass mutual retiresmart calculate ira distribution hflcx tax rate on ordinary dividends t rowe price health sciences prhsx top s&p 500 index funds harbor mid cap growth how much can i deposit in a roth ira social security calculator disability early distribution penalty exceptions goldman sachs small cap value r early withdrawal from 401k penalty exceptions should i do roth 401k or traditional western asset intermediate term municipals fund jp morgan retirement plan services phone number best performing large cap mutual funds are roth 401 k contributions tax deductible social security back pay lump sum can you deduct mortgage interest on second home t rowe price spectrum growth fund how does a retainer fee work collecting social security from ex husband vanguard junk bond etf kroger 401k merrill lynch franklin templeton roth ira fidelity small cap enhanced index fund vanguard 2035 target retirement fund tax deduction home equity loan gold mutual funds morningstar does hugh hefner have children jpmorgan chase financial advisor merrill lynch personal investment advisory program james kennedy t rowe price what is a ira roth genworth financial richmond va