Morgan Stanley dumps broker recruiting protocol

Brokers moving to a new firm would be forbidden for 12 months from contacting clients once they left

Oct 30, 2017 @ 11:26 am

By Bruce Kelly

Morgan Stanley's decision to leave an industry agreement known as the protocol for broker recruiting is an indication that the firm is working harder than ever to prevent its brokers from jumping ship, industry sources said.

One reason for that perspective is that Morgan Stanley managers were told on Monday morning that new employment agreements may include a one-year non-solicit agreement. Under such an agreement, Morgan Stanley brokers moving to a new firm would be forbidden for 12 months from contacting clients once they left, according to those sources.

Morgan Stanley intends to withdraw from the protocol on Friday.

Morgan Stanley advisers were told in an email Monday that the firm would enforce client confidentiality and non-solicitation agreements.

(More: Morgan Stanley dumps broker recruiting protocol)

"With our exit from the protocol, advisers are subject to the terms of any applicable client non-solicitation restrictions and/or confidentiality obligations, including restrictions on removing client-related information," according to the email. "The provisions of the protocol that permit advisers to take certain client data and solicit clients when transitioning from one protocol firm to another will no longer apply."

"It means that Morgan Stanley could go to court and get a [temporary restraining order] against any adviser who leaves," said Danny Sarch, an industry recruiter, who noted that the firm had recently filed TROs against advisers who inherited client accounts from other advisers and had recently moved to competitors. "What's Morgan Stanley's strategy now? It's like the Hotel California," he said, referring to the classic song by the Eagles. "You can check in but you can never leave."

One veteran adviser wondered whether a non-solicit agreement could be applied to existing accounts or only to new clients. "Would that be supported for accounts retroactively or newly opened," asked the adviser, who requested to speak anonymously. He added that he had not seen anything in writing from the company about a new non-solicit agreement.

"A non-solicit means advisers can't reach out to clients but [clients] can reach out to advisers," noted Howard Diamond, chief operating officer and general counsel for Diamond Consultants, an industry recruiter. "In the fiduciary era, clients want to go with their advisers. We think this is incredibly short-sighted and takes adviser choice away."

(More: Morgan Stanley is waving the white flag on recruiting)

"Investors have long relationships with brokers, although firms like to think the relationship is with the firm, and sometime it is," said Brent Burns, an industry attorney. "But most of the relationship is with the adviser. Watch all the ads on TV — the broker is at the wedding, he's there when the baby is born."

"Now Morgan Stanley is saying, you can't take or service the client," he said. "I think brokers will still leave Morgan Stanley and clients will contact them. Will Morgan Stanley then go after the advisers? And will the other firms follow?"

"Morgan Stanley expects all departing [financial advisers] to honor their non-solicitation obligation," said company spokeswoman Margaret Draper.

Morgan Stanley on Monday said that as part of its effort to reduce recruiting and emphasize training it was pulling out of the protocol, a more than decade-old industry agreement designed to limit litigation against brokers when they moved from one firm to another.

Before the 2004 agreement, it was common for large firms like Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch to sue advisers when they left, commonly freezing clients from trading in their accounts.

The protocol established a methodology for a broker to depart which, if followed, would no longer subject them to temporary restraining orders or other legal machinations. It also protected client privacy by forbidding brokers from copying their books ahead of time and providing the client data to their new firm without their clients' consent.

The protocol established a "universal set of rules for advisers to follow when leaving one protocol member firm and joining another," Morgan Stanley said in a statement. "However, over time the protocol has become replete with opportunities for gamesmanship and loopholes."

(More: Morgan Stanley says recruiting and attrition have slowed down)

Firms have not been following the spirit of the agreement, according to Morgan Stanley. "Firms have opportunistically joined the protocol to make a strategic hire and then dropped out," according to the company statement. "Firms have invoked the benefits of the protocol when hiring while using non-protocol affiliates to circumvent the protocol when they lose talent."

The announcement was part of a wider statement about Morgan Stanley's efforts to support existing advisers.

Morgan Stanley in May said it was joining competitors like UBS Financial Services and Merrill Lynch by reducing its reliance on recruiting experienced advisers with big signing bonuses and instead make changes that would emphasize building in-house staff.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Use Mopedia' to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Upcoming Event

May 02


Women Adviser Summit

The Mopedia Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Integration can mean of different things to advisers. What does it mean to you? Marc Butler of Albridge Solutions explains how it is powering advisory practices.

Video Spotlight

Recommended Video


Latest news & opinion

Despite January's run-up in stocks, investors headed to bonds

More than $46 billion went to taxable bonds last month, versus $17 billion flowing into stock funds and ETFs.

Alternative funds suddenly look a whole lot better

The market sell-off highlights the virtues of hedging.

Why the new tax law amounts to a 'stealth' tax increase

The government will use an inflation measure that causes things like marginal income tax rates to rise more slowly.

Exchange-traded notes add another layer of risk

ETNs tied to volatility took a beating when stocks plunged.

SEC exam priorities target fee disclosures to retail investors

Agency also to take close look at Finra, cybersecurity, market structure.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at Mopedia. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Last News

vanguard index funds s&p 500 pension lump sum or annuity calculator what is cfp certification vanguard international small cap rollover ira definition index funds usaa fica-oasdi limit fidelity advisor fees divorced social security benefits fidelity arizona college savings plan traditional ira irs touchstone focused fund taxation of reit dividends plan sponsor definition social security retirement survivors and disability insurance social security benefits for deceased parent is a 401k an ira for tax purposes how to calculate lump sum pension payout how long do you receive social security survivor benefits mutual of america 2045 retirement fund jp morgan chase health savings account calpers long term care class action franklin federal limited term tax free income fund converting non deductible ira contributions to a roth i received a 1099 r for a rollover cost of living adjustment for ssi ssa what is the rarest us coin cost of factset subscription wells fargo cds rates what does hr block charge generation xy baby boomers how to amend federal tax return ohio 529 college savings plan value fund vs growth fund are term life insurance proceeds taxable