Advisory firm owners unlikely to see windfall on tax returns from House bill

Proposed legislation is designed to give manufacturers the lower 25% tax rate, not professional service firms such as financial advisers, lawyers and accountants

Nov 2, 2017 @ 5:18 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Financial advisers who own their own firms and pay their business taxes through their personal returns probably won't see a windfall from the House Republican tax proposal released on Thursday.

Under the plan, small businesses that operate as so-called pass throughs could be eligible for a 25% tax rate rather than having to pay as much as 39.6% at the top individual level. But by and large, the benefit will go to manufacturing firms, leaving out the service sector, such as law, accounting, consulting and financial services. Only certain dividends of real estate investment trusts would qualify in the financial category.

"Brokers and investment advisers operating through partnerships, limited liability companies and S corporations will generally be excluded from the lower tax rate," said Howard Wagner, managing director of the accounting firm Crowe Horwath.

One reason for the bifurcation is that Republicans need to finance the ambitious individual and corporate tax cuts in the sweeping plan and couldn't give the 25% rate to all small businesses. The plan lowers the rate for a traditional corporation from 35% to 20%.

"They're trying to target the manufacturers, people out creating things, as opposed to the service sector," said Tim Steffen, director of advanced planning at Baird Private Wealth Management. "They had to draw the line somewhere for revenue purposes."

That demarcation has the small business lobby on the other side of Capitol Hill Republicans for now. The National Federation of Independent Business said that most small businesses won't qualify for a tax cut.

"We think that it's bad public policy to discriminate against businesses depending on what they do," said Jack Mozloom, NFIB national media director. "We want the manufacturers to get a tax cut, but also their accountants and financial advisers."

Advisers would still benefit from the tax bill because their clients are likely to be better off under its provisions, said James Hickey, chief investment strategist at HD Vest Financial Services.

"Even if they excluded financial firms from taking advantage of the new lower pass-through rates, their clients all of a sudden will have a lot more income and [clients'] savings will grow," Mr. Hickey said. "It's an [assets under management] game, and you win."

The bill released on Thursday is only the beginning of tax reform. Lawmakers hope to get a final measure to President Donald J. Trump by the end of the year. There's a long legislative road ahead, which provides many opportunities to change provisions.

"It's something that will be heavily lobbied," Mr. Wagner said of the pass-through policy.

But Mr. Steffen is not confident that it will be changed.

"Everything's on the table," he said. But "it seems like expanding the business tax cut is not the direction they're going to go."

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Deputy editor Bob Hordt and senior columnist Bruce Kelly discuss the reasons for the marked shift of advisers between channels, including technology, the DOL fiduciary rule and the broker protocol.

Recommended Video

Channels

Latest news & opinion

Capital Group, sponsor of American Funds, wins 401(k) lawsuit

Decision comes as financial services companies, especially those focused on active management, have been sued for self-dealing.

SEC considers barring aggrieved investors from suing companies

Swept up by pro-business zeitgeist, regulator seeks to reverse two-decade slump in U.S. stock listings.

Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley use contrary tactics to keep advisers

Wells is helping brokers transition to independence within the firm, while Morgan is taking them to court.

Fidelity pushes Vanguard to compete on brand in 401(k) plans

With Fidelity imposing an additional fee, Vanguard likely will look less attractive compared with comparably priced index-fund providers, advisers said.

Goldman's measure of risk appetite hits record

Global stocks and U.S. Treasuries are seeing their most "extreme" start to a year ever, bank says.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at Mopedia. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting Mopedia.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist Mopedia.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Last News

tax on reits cfp exams high dividend reit stocks lump sum distribution from pension schwab trade cost morning star mutual funds jp morgan offer letter 2014 medicare tax limit templeton foreign fund a ssa gov benefits calendar t rowe price 2025 what is a ssa-1099 what is a deferred variable annuity american funds the income fund of america t rowe price capital appreciation portfolio how to roll over an ira what does the grandfather clause mean extra social security benefits for veterans how much is the original charizard card worth anna nicole smith net worth at death vanguard total stock market index fund admiral shares reasons to amend a tax return how to compute social security tax american capital realty partners social security for widowed spouses in retirement njbest 529 college savings plan value of 1943 copper penny charizard 1st edition holographic value vanguard mutual fund symbols pimco municipal bond fund american funds 2040 target date retirement fund withdrawal from 401k without penalty mandatory withdrawals from retirement accounts schwab alliance com login john hancock pensions sign in is genworth a good company