Former LPL broker loses $30 million claim against old firm

Two of the three Finra arbitrators split their decisions in the case of James E. 'Jeb' Bashaw, a one-time star at LPL who was fired in 2014

Nov 2, 2017 @ 12:45 pm

By Bruce Kelly

A one-time star broker with lost a securities arbitration decision last month in which he sought $30 million in damages claiming that the company ruined his career.

The three-person Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. panel on Oct. 24 denied the claims of the broker, James E. "Jeb" Bashaw, who was fired from LPL in 2014 and sued the firm and its former CEO, Mark Casady, two years later.

Mr. Bashaw and his firm, Jeb & Co., alleged that "LPL commenced an audit in furtherance of its plan to raid JebCo's employees, steal Bashaw's clients, and to destroy his career," according to the arbitration decision. Mr. Bashaw also claimed defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, raiding and other allegations.

While Mr. Bashaw's claims were denied, LPL did not escape the matter completely unscathed. The arbitration panel ordered LPL to pay Mr. Bashaw $25,000 in legal fees because it failed to produce documents as ordered or show good cause for not producing the documents, according to the decision.

A spokesman for LPL, Jeff Mochal, said that "LPL is pleased with the decision of the independent arbitrators and happy to have this matter resolved."

Mr. Bashaw, who is now registered with International Assets Advisory, said he was traveling and did not comment. Mr. Casady did not respond to requests to comment made through social media.

SPLIT DECISIONS

One unusual aspect of the decision was that two of the three arbitrators split their decisions, both agreeing and not agreeing with the panel's decision.

The presiding chair, Brian J. Tagtmeier, signed off on the decision saying he was "concurring as to the panel's decision on the motion for sanctions" and "dissenting as to the panel's decision on the merits."

Another arbitrator, Alan M. Holzberg, signed the decision saying he was "concurring as to the panel's decision on the merits; dissenting as to the panel's decision on the motion for sanctions."

As is typical with the overwhelming majority of Finra arbitration decisions, the panel gave no explanation for its decision or why two members split their decisions.

In September 2014, LPL Financial axed Mr. Bashaw, for three reasons, according to his BrokerCheck report: participating in private securities transactions without written disclosure or approval; engaging in a business transaction without written disclosure or approval; and borrowing money from a client.

On BrokerCheck, Mr. Bashaw responded by saying he contested the "accuracy, validity and motive" for LPL terminating his employment.

Mr. Bashaw was a star broker in Houston; in 2011, Barron's magazine ranked him the top financial adviser in Texas, with total assets of $3.8 billion. Industry sources at the time said he had a total of about two dozen advisers working under him in various offices.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Deputy editor Bob Hordt and senior columnist Bruce Kelly discuss the reasons for the marked shift of advisers between channels, including technology, the DOL fiduciary rule and the broker protocol.

Recommended Video

Channels

Latest news & opinion

Independent broker-dealers are stepping up their game on recruiting from the wirehouses

Independent broker-dealers have narrowed the gap between themselves and the wirehouses and are able to attract more quality brokers from the Big Four.

Capital Group, sponsor of American Funds, wins 401(k) lawsuit

Decision comes as financial services companies, especially those focused on active management, have been sued for self-dealing.

SEC considers barring aggrieved investors from suing companies

Swept up by pro-business zeitgeist, regulator seeks to reverse two-decade slump in U.S. stock listings.

Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley use contrary tactics to keep advisers

Wells is helping brokers transition to independence within the firm, while Morgan is taking them to court.

Fidelity pushes Vanguard to compete on brand in 401(k) plans

With Fidelity imposing an additional fee, Vanguard likely will look less attractive compared with comparably priced index-fund providers, advisers said.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at Mopedia. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting Mopedia.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist Mopedia.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Last News

when can i take 401k without penalty 401k ira rollover rules ivy high income opportunities fund 529 college savings plan va 529 plan maine t209 baseball cards phased drawdown calculator vanguard ira distribution form minimum 401k withdrawals 401k distributions after age 55 liberty national life insurance birmingham withdrawing from ira without penalty metlife calculator can you deduct mortgage interest on second home target date funds good or bad age to withdraw from ira without penalty phone number for ssi wage reporting what is the value of a 1943 penny pros and cons of a 401k wells fargo short term bond fund what is a large blend mutual fund using roth ira for college savings roth 401k vs traditional 401 k social security when a spouse dies signing up for social security and medicare franklin income fund class a wiki world trade center morningstar investment services review edward jones bridge builder is florida prepaid a 529 plan how much money is fdic insured dodge & cox value equity fund top 20 mutual funds janus global bond fund student loan parent plus ge long term care insurance general revenue corporation lawsuit dow jones 20 years