Outside voices and views for advisers

IBDs can protect good advisers from bad recruits

Compliance teams must rigorously vet the records of new advisers in order to limit the risks that come with consolidation-driven recruits

Nov 3, 2017 @ 7:58 am

By Steve Youhn

I recently had lunch with an independent adviser affiliated with a firm that had acquired a smaller broker-dealer and most of its reps some time ago. Since then, highly anticipated platform enhancements the acquirer had planned to make that would have benefited the firm's existing reps never materialized, much to this adviser's disappointment.

The reason, in the adviser's words, was as follows: "The home office didn't weed out recruits with major compliance issues that were in the acquired block of reps who joined our firm. The regulatory fines kept coming after they transitioned to our firm, and at a certain point, this ate up the capital set aside to reinvest in the business."

Unfortunately, this is an issue that independent advisers may increasingly face as consolidation – and fears of potential consolidation – begin driving waves of advisers into the marketplace.

When firms fail to protect themselves against high compliance-risk reps that come in as part of a large volume of new recruits, existing advisers at these firms lose out. Payouts can suffer, while new investments in tech and service platforms could be significantly delayed.

Although Finra and the SEC have been taking steps to provide further regulatory guidance on the recruiting and supervision of "high risk and recidivist" reps, firms across the industry owe it to their existing advisers to take these steps to block recruits with checkered compliance histories.


Step 1: Drive closer alignment between the business development and compliance supervision teams in identifying and vetting recruits. It's essential to provide the compliance and supervision functions of a firm with a seat at the new-adviser selection committee table. This maximizes the chances of flagging, from the outset, potential track-record issues.

Step 2: Establish a uniform cap on the number of compliance disclosures allowable for new recruits. It's not unheard of for firms to adopt a "case by case" approach in determining the upper limit of compliance disclosures.

While this may work when prospective new recruits can be very carefully vetted on an individual basis, when it comes to high-volume adviser transitions that are part of a consolidation-driven event, a more uniform upper limit must be established as a basic vetting tool. Whatever the number of maximum allowable disclosures for new recruits, the upper limit must be transparently communicated and enforced without exceptions.

Step 3: Clarify your compliance risk "no fly zones." Beyond establishing an upper limit of allowable compliance disclosures for new recruits, also remember that not all disclosures are created equally. Each firm should have a clearly articulated list of "no fly zone" disclosures that are an absolute block against allowing a prospective recruit to join the firm, regardless of whether the total number of disclosures has reached the allowable upper limit or not.

Examples of this could be prior terminations for undisclosed Outside Business Activities (OBAs) or selling away. What constitutes an absolute block may vary by firm, but there must be a clearly communicated list of non-negotiable compliance issues.

Step 4: Never assume the first disclosed lien is the only one. When bringing onboard advisers with a disclosed lien, it's crucial that firms not assume the Form U4 is current and up to date. Firms should conduct credit and background checks before allowing a new recruit that fits this description to join their platforms, and keep doing this at least once a year for the next two to three years thereafter.

Unfortunately, the first disclosed lien is frequently followed by a second and third. Firms should be particularly wary of new recruits with disclosed liens who fail to disclose subsequently received liens, as this suggests a willful attempt to evade disclosure.

Whenever the consolidation drums start to beat across the industry, firms can lose sight of certain critical risk management protocols as the competitive quest to grow through large-volume recruiting of displaced or acquired advisers takes center stage.

While consolidation-driven recruiting growth can represent an opportunity that should be captured aggressively, this should be carefully balanced with an embrace of the obligations owed to existing advisers by ensuring waves of new recruits don't jeopardize other aspects of the business over the long term.

Steve Youhn is Chief Compliance Officer of ProEquities, Inc.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join Mopedia at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

I have some bad news: Most financial advisers fail when it comes to reaching different client demographics. How can you use technology to beat the odds? Advicent's Anthony Stich offers some strategies.

Video Spotlight

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video


Latest news & opinion

Ed Slott on Roth IRA conversions becoming permanent

Proposal would remove recharacterization option from advisers' toolkit.

Tax reform: How the House bill changes rules for retirement savings

While pre-tax 401(k) contribution limits are off the table (for now), the Republican tax bill nonetheless makes changes to retirement savings plans.

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton's quest to forge a fiduciary standard

The new SEC chairman is confident he can up come with a rule better than that of the Department of Labor — one that satisfies brokers, investment advisers and investor advocates alike.

Morgan Stanley advisers feel burned by broker protocol exit

Some reps, including those already thinking of leaving, say the firm only cares about the bottom line.

Former LPL broker loses $30 million claim against old firm

Two of the three Finra arbitrators split their decisions in the case of James E. 'Jeb' Bashaw, a one-time star at LPL who was fired in 2014.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Last News

basic turbotax vanguard international stock index fund eaton vance commodity strategy fund pension buyout calculator morningstar premium research maximum earnings while drawing social security mid term afr rates turbotax e file fee ssdi estimate chase staffing services cfp exam passing score how to calculate pension buyout aon boston high dividend reit stocks best aggressive growth etf 1099r code 1 fdic insurance limit american funds income fund of america a vanguard target retirement 2030 fund vanguard s&p index fund index fund fees comparison federated high yield bond social security disability survivor benefits financial advice for widows retirement age 66 fidelity individual 401k psers health insurance maximum insured amount bank account partial surrender life insurance 401k early distribution penalty exceptions roth ira advantages blackrock large cap value retirement k